| # | 日期 | 条目内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 183 | 2025/04/08 | NOTICE of cancellation and/or termination by national bond center. (Envelope postmarked 04/03/2025) (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 04/08/2025.) |
| 182 | 2025/03/11 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/11/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 181 | 2025/03/11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for release of the surety bond 180 is granted. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice. |
| 180 | 2025/03/10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for bond Motion for Release of Surety Bond |
| 179 | 2025/02/07 | ENTERED stipulated final judgment Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 2/7/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 178 | 2025/02/07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The agreed motion for a stipulated final judgment and injunction order 177 is granted. Separate order to issue. This order appears to resolve all matters raised by this case and there is nothing that remains for the Court to do. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 177 | 2025/02/06 | MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for judgment and Injunction Order (Joint) |
| 176 | 2024/12/27 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any questions regarding this process, this LINK will provide additional information. Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/27/2024: Mailed notice. |
| 175 | 2024/12/10 | Joint STATEMENT by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. |
| 174 | 2024/12/09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court requests that the parties file a short statement on the docket by December 11, 2024 that indicates whether and which Defendants still remain as parties to this action in light of the various stipulations of dismissal [ 167, 170, 173 ]. Mailed notice. |
| 173 | 2024/12/06 | STIPULATION of Dismissal As To Defendants Nos. 5, 6, 10, 14, 15, 16, 26, 27, 30, And 31 |
| 172 | 2024/10/11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Attorney Matthew D. Binder's motion to withdraw 171 is granted. Attorney Matthew D. Binder no longer assigned to this case Emailed notice |
| 171 | 2024/10/11 | MOTION by Attorney Matthew D. Binder to withdraw as attorney for Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. No party information provided |
| 170 | 2024/10/01 | STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Modern Stylish |
| 169 | 2024/09/25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court sets the following fact discovery schedule after reviewing the parties' proposals: Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures are due by October 11, 2024; written discovery may first issue by October 11, 2024. All fact discovery shall be noticed in time for completion by June 3, 2025. An amendment to the pleadings or additions to the named parties must be filed by April 24, 2025. The parties' filing sets out their respective positions on the number of interrogatories and amount of necessary deposition time. Rather than wade into this debate now, the Court encourages the parties to work cooperatively on discovery as they have been doing in other Roadget cases, bearing in mind the proportionality requirement of Rule 26. A joint status report as to the progress of fact discovery is due by May 16, 2025, at which time the parties should confirm that fact discovery will close on time and the Court will enter the parties' proposed expert discovery schedule. Mailed notice. |
| 168 | 2024/09/24 | STATUS Report (Joint) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. |
| 167 | 2024/09/12 | STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Certain Defendants |
| 166 | 2024/09/10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In its prior order, the Court tentatively concluded that severance was appropriate but explained it would not order severance until it gave Roadget an opportunity to file an amended complaint to allege Defendants coordinate their infringement, an argument Roadget developed in its briefing but had not alleged in its original complaint. (See Dkt. 131 at 20 ("The Court agrees that if these facts were alleged, they would satisfy Rule 20(a)(2)(A).") Roadget has now filed an amended complaint that, among other things, adds allegations of coordinating exercised by Temu. [Dkt. 139 at paras. 17-19.] At the dismissal stage, the Court must take factual allegations as true and draw reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff. Choice v. Kohn L. Firm, S.C., 77 F.4th 636, 638 (7th Cir. 2023). The added allegations of coordination exercised by Temu, including retention of the same counsel in multiple cases, supports an inference of coordination sufficient to satisfy Rule 20(a)(2)(A)'s requirement that the claims against Defendants form a single series of transactions or occurrences. If, as Roadget alleges, Temu coordinates or directs Defendants' sales of the allegedly infringing products, then there is a logical relationship between the claims against Defendants, which stem from that central coordination. See In re EMC, 677 F.3d 1351, 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Therefore, the renewed motion to sever 162 is denied. By September 24, 2024 the parties are to file a proposed fact discovery schedule so that fact discovery can promptly get underway. Mailed notice. |
| 165 | 2024/09/04 | REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to response to motion, 164, MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21 162 |
| 164 | 2024/08/28 | RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21 162 |
| 163 | 2024/08/14 | MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion to sever 162 |
| 162 | 2024/08/14 | MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever Under Rules 20 and 21 |
| 161 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Shengmin Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA TT and MM (No. 31 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 160 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Tianmen Tongxin E-Commerce Business Department's DBA TongxinShow (No. 30 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 159 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Tinglin Clothing Firm's DBA TL Ladies (No. 29 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 158 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Haikou Meilan District Ayer Clothing Store's DBA Sunseeker leaf clothing (No. 27 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 157 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Haikou Longhua Huanyou Yanxuan Department Store's DBA SKE (No. 26 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 156 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Jinglun Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA OYIJIA (No. 22 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 155 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 154 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 153 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Xinhui District Wenqi Garment Factory's DBA MODERN STYLISH (No. 17 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 152 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 151 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Lijie He's DBA Miaoshang Clothing (No. 15 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 150 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Tianmen Maqiduo Clothing Factory's DBA Macchiatto Red (No. 14 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 149 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Xinfengyi Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Hongqin (No. 10 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 148 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Shahe Xiameng Clothing Store's DBA focus queen (No. 9 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 147 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Tianmen Zhanggang Duoxi Clothing's DBA Duoxi Clothing (No. 6 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 146 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Quanzhang Yang's DBA Cantonese C (No. 5 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 145 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Guangzhou Baishan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA baishan (No.4 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 144 | 2024/08/06 | Defendant Lihong Hu's dba A YI YUAN (No. 2 in Schedule A) ANSWER to amended complaint by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 143 | 2024/07/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff has filed the amended complaint 139. The order entered 7/24/2024 142 is AMENDED. Defendants may renew their motion to sever by August 14, 2024; any response is due by August 28, 2024 and any reply is due by September 4, 2024. Mailed notice. |
| 142 | 2024/07/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Roadget's Amended Complaint should be filed by or before July 31, 2024; Defendants may renew their motion to sever by August 14, 2024; any response is due by August 28, 2024 and any reply is due by September 4, 2024. Mailed notice. |
| 141 | 2024/07/24 | ENTERED PARTIAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/24/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 140 | 2024/07/24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following Order applies only to Defendant No. 1 (Trendy Global Store); Defendant No. 3 (Bag's Generation Store); Defendant No. 8 (Elegant and Stylish Skirts Store); Defendant No. 11 (KELE FASHION); and Defendant No. 13 (Luxury Boutique Store). None of these Defendants have responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 132 is granted. Enter Partial Final Judgment Order. Mailed notice. |
| 139 | 2024/07/23 | First AMENDED complaint by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 138 | 2024/07/23 | Proposal for next steps pursuant to minute order (ECF No. 130) and memorandum opinion and order (ECF No. 131) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. |
| 137 | 2024/07/15 |
DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson regarding order on motion for entry of default, order on motion for default judgment, order on motion to seal, text entry, 136 Declaration of service of minute order
Taylor J. Wilson关于默认判决动议命令、密封动议命令、文本录入、第136号服务分钟命令的声明 |
| 136 | 2024/07/15 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following Order applies only to Defendant Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13. Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 132 for entry of default and default judgment against Defendants 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13. These defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before July 22, 2024. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. The motion to seal 134 is granted. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持下的记录：以下命令仅适用于被告编号1、3、8、11和13。法院目前面临原告针对被告1、3、8、11和13提出的第132号动议，要求进入缺席判决和默认判决。这些被告既未答辩也未以其他方式出庭应对此诉讼。因此，根据联邦民事诉讼规则第55(a)条，缺席判决已作出。对要求进入默认判决的动议的任何异议必须在2024年7月22日或之前提交。如果届时未提出异议，法院将视为该动议未受反对。原告必须在案卷登记后的一个工作日内向被告送达此记录，并必须立即提交送达证明。第134号密封动议获得批准。邮寄通知。 |
| 135 | 2024/07/12 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Memorandum in support of Plainitff Roadget's motion for entry of default and default judgment against Defendants Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, & 13
封存的文件，由原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交。支持原告Roadget申请对被告1、3、8、11和13号进行缺席判决和默认判决的备忘录。 |
| 134 | 2024/07/12 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Motion for leave to file supporting papers to motion for default and default judgment under seal
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出封存申请，请求允许提交支持默认判决和封存默认判决动议的文件 |
| 133 | 2024/07/12 |
MEMORANDUM by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment, 132 (Redacted Version)
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.就申请默认判决的动议提交的备忘录，132号（删节版） |
| 132 | 2024/07/12 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for entry of default and, MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for default judgment as to Defendants Nos. 1, 3, 8, 11, and 13
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.申请默认判决，以及原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.对被告编号1、3、8、11和13申请默认判决 |
| 131 | 2024/07/09 |
ENTERED MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 7/9/2024. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官于2024年7月9日撰写的备忘录意见和命令。已邮寄通知。 |
| 130 | 2024/07/09 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion to dismiss 85 is denied without prejudice, and the motion to dismiss or sever 107 is granted in part and denied in part. The second motion is tentatively granted to the extent that the Court concludes that severance is appropriate, but the Court will not order severance until Plaintiff has an opportunity to propose next steps, as indicated in the attached order. By July 23, 2024, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, file a status report indicating that it wishes to take an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), or make another motion. If so, then the Court will proceed as indicated in the order. If Plaintiff does not take one of these steps, the Court will enter an order granting the motion to sever, which would go into effect immediately. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：被告提出的驳回动议85被无偏见地否决，而驳回或分割动议107部分获准部分被否决。第二项动议初步获准，法院认为分割是适当的，但法院将在原告有机会提出下一步建议之前不会下令分割，如附令所示。原告须在2024年7月23日前提交修改后的起诉书，提交状态报告表明其希望根据28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)进行中间上诉，或提出其他动议。如果是这样，法院将按照命令进行。如果原告不采取这些步骤之一，法院将下达分割动议的命令，该命令将立即生效。邮寄通知。 |
| 129 | 2024/07/08 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. As To Defendant San San Clothing
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.自愿撤销对被告San San Clothing的诉讼通知 |
| 128 | 2024/06/20 |
STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Defendants Earna and SYLP PLUS
关于被告Earna和SYLP PLUS的撤诉协议 |
| 127 | 2024/06/20 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant Longdashiye
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 对被告Longdashiye的自愿撤诉通知 |
| 126 | 2024/06/20 |
REPLY by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to motion to sever 107
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto对107号动议的回复 |
| 125 | 2024/06/17 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant Simile
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 对被告Simile的自愿撤诉通知 |
| 124 | 2024/06/04 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The joint motion to remove incorrectly filed documents 121 is granted in part. Because the Court cannot remove a document from the docket, it directs that the items filed at 120 be sealed. Plaintiff has already refiled its corrected response to the motion at 123 and the unopposed motion to seal that response 122 is granted. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持下进行的记录：部分批准了联合动议以移除错误提交的文件[121]。由于法院无法从案卷中移除文件，指示将提交在[120]处的物品密封。原告已重新提交其对动议的更正回应于[123]，并且关于密封该回应的无异议动议[122]已获批准。已发送通知。 |
| 123 | 2024/06/03 |
SEALED RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed) 107
封存的回应。Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的分割动议（反对）的回应，文件编号107。 |
| 122 | 2024/06/03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Corrected Response To Motion To Sever
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出动议，要求封存对分割动议的更正回应 |
| 121 | 2024/06/03 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出动议，要求移除错误提交的文件 |
| 120 | 2024/05/30 |
RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed) 107
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的分割动议作出反对回应（反对）107 |
| 119 | 2024/05/29 |
REPLY by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to response to motion, 111 in Support of Motion to Dismiss
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto对动议的回复，第111项支持驳回动议的动议 |
| 118 | 2024/05/29 |
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to Defendant GUANGZHOUSHIOUHUIMANFANGZHIPIN CO., LTD.
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 对被告GUANGZHOUSHIOUHUIMANFANGZHIPIN CO., LTD. 的自愿撤诉通知 |
| 117 | 2024/05/22 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by William W. Flachsbart (Corrected)
William W. Flachsbart代表被告，即本文件附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织出庭（已更正） |
| 116 | 2024/05/22 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant's motion to seal 109 is granted. The document filed at 110 may remain under seal. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：被告关于密封第109号文件的动议获得批准。第110号文件可以继续保持密封状态。已发送通知。 |
| 115 | 2024/05/21 |
Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告天门上言服装店(DBA 木桑依服装，清单A第19项)对原告(清单A所列个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织)的起诉书提出陪审团要求的修正答辩。 |
| 114 | 2024/05/21 |
Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA as Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告东莞一枝芳服饰有限公司以Monca（表A第18项）和Saso（表A第24项）的名义，对原告名单中列出的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非公司组织的起诉提出陪审团要求的修正答辩。 |
| 113 | 2024/05/21 |
Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州爱思源服饰有限公司，经营名称为现代风格（清单A第16项），对原告的起诉书提出陪审团要求的修正答辩，涉及清单A所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 112 | 2024/05/16 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's response to the motion to severe 107 is due by May 30, 2024 and Defendants' reply is due by June 13, 2024.Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：原告对分离动议[107]的回应截止日期为2024年5月30日，被告的回复截止日期为2024年6月13日。已发送通知。 |
| 111 | 2024/05/15 |
RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的因未能陈述索赔理由而要求驳回的动议作出回应 |
| 110 | 2024/05/15 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Exhibit 1
封存的文件。由被告，即本文件附件A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织提交的展品1 |
| 109 | 2024/05/15 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal Exhibit 1
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出密封Exhibit 1的动议 |
| 108 | 2024/05/15 |
MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion to sever[107]
关于个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及未注册协会（详见附件A）的备忘录，支持分离动议[107] |
| 107 | 2024/05/15 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sever (Opposed)
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的分案动议（反对） |
| 106 | 2024/05/01 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's response to the motion to dismiss 85 is due by May 15, 2024 and Defendants' reply is due by May 29, 2024. The motion to seal 87 is granted; Exhibits 1 and 2 to the motion to dismiss may remain under seal. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：原告对驳回动议85的回应截止日期为2024年5月15日，被告的回复截止日期为2024年5月29日。密封动议87获得批准；驳回动议中的展品1和2可继续密封。已发送通知。 |
| 105 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Guangzhou Shengmin Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA TT and MM (No. 31 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州盛民服装有限公司DBA TT和MM（清单A第31项）对原告（即本清单A所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非公司组织）的起诉状提出答辩，并要求陪审团审理 |
| 104 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Tianmen Tongxin E-Commerce Business Department's DBA TongxinShow (No. 30 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告天门同心电子商务业务部以通心秀（清单A第30项）名义对清单A中所列个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织的起诉提出答辩并要求陪审团审理 |
| 103 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Guangzhou Tinglin Clothing Firm's DBA TL Ladies (No. 29 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州婷琳服饰有限公司DBA TL女士（附表A第29项）对原告的起诉及陪审团要求作出答辩，原告为附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织 |
| 102 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Shenzhen Bao'an Xuanyi Wardrobe Clothing Factory's DBA SYLP PLUS (No. 28 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告深圳宝安轩逸衣柜服装厂的DBA SYLP PLUS（清单A中第28项）对原告提出的诉状及陪审团要求作出答辩，原告包括清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 101 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Haikou Meilan District Ayer Clothing Store's DBA Sunseeker leaf clothing (No. 27 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告海口美兰区Ayer服装店（DBA Sunseeker叶装，清单A第27项）对原告（清单A所列个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织）的起诉及陪审团要求提出答辩 |
| 100 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Haikou Longhua Huanyou Yanxuan Department Store's DBA SKE (No. 26 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告海口龙华幻游轩选商店的DBA SKE（清单A中第26项）对原告的起诉书提出答辩，并要求陪审团审理，原告包括本清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 99 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Guangzhou Jinglun Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA OYIJIA (No. 22 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州晶伦服饰有限公司DBA OYIJIA（清单A中第22项）对清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非公司组织的投诉提出答辩，并要求陪审团审理 |
| 98 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Tianmen Shangyan Clothing Store's DBA Musangyi clothing (No. 19 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告天门尚言服装店以Musangyi服装名义（附表A中第19项）对原告提出的诉状及陪审团要求作出答辩，涉及附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 97 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Dongguan Yizhifang Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Monca (No. 18 in Schedule A) and DBA as Saso (No. 24 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告东莞一枝芳服饰有限公司以DBA Monca（表A第18项）和DBA Saso（表A第24项）的名义对诉状及陪审团要求作出回应，涉及表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业和非公司组织 |
| 96 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Guangzhou Aisiyuan Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Modern style (No. 16 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州爱思源服饰有限公司，DBA现代风格（清单A第16项）对原告，即本清单A所列个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织的投诉及陪审团要求作出答辩。 |
| 95 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Lijie He's DBA Miaoshang Clothing (No. 15 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Lijie He的DBA Miaoshang Clothing（附表A第15项）对原告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto的起诉状及陪审团请求作出答辩 |
| 94 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Tianmen Maqiduo Clothing Factory's DBA Macchiatto Red (No. 14 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告天门麻其多服装厂的DBA Macchiatto Red（清单A中第14项）对原告的起诉书提出答辩，并要求陪审团审理，原告包括本清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 93 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Guangzhou Xinfengyi Clothing Co., Ltd.'s DBA Hongqin (No. 10 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州新丰衣服饰有限公司，以Hongqin名义（清单A中第10项），对原告的起诉及陪审团要求提出答辩，原告包括清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 92 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Shahe Xiameng Clothing Store, Tianhe District, Guangzhou's DBA focus queen (No. 9 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告广州市天河区沙河希望梦服装店，以DBA focus queen（清单A中第9号）的名义，对原告清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织提出的带有陪审团要求的诉状作出答辩 |
| 91 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Dongguan Humen Ruining Clothing Store's DBA Earna (No. 7 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告东莞市虎门镇瑞宁服装店以Earna名义（附表A中第7项）对原告提出的陪审团要求作出答辩，原告包括附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 90 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Tianmen Zhanggang Duoxi Clothing's DBA Duoxi Clothing (No. 6 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告天门张港多喜服饰公司，DBA多喜服饰（清单A中第6项）对原告提出的诉讼作出答辩，并要求陪审团审理，原告为清单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织。 |
| 89 | 2024/04/30 |
Defendant Quanzhang Yang's DBA Cantonese C (No. 5 in Schedule A) ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Quanzhang Yang的DBA Cantonese C（清单A中第5项）对原告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto的起诉状提出答辩并要求陪审团审理 |
| 88 | 2024/04/30 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Exhibit 1 and (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 2)
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Exhibit 1提交的封存文件及附件（附件1：Exhibit 2） |
| 87 | 2024/04/30 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document memorandum in support of motion, [86] Exhibits 1 and 2
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的密封文件备忘录支持动议的动议，附展品1和2 [86] |
| 86 | 2024/04/30 |
MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, motion to dismiss/lack of jurisdiction, [85]
关于The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto的备忘录，支持因未能陈述索赔理由而提出的驳回动议，以及因缺乏管辖权而提出的驳回动议，[85] |
| 85 | 2024/04/30 |
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的因未能陈述索赔而要求驳回的动议 |
| 84 | 2024/04/24 |
ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/24/2024. Mailed notice.
由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官于2024年4月24日签署的命令。已邮寄通知。 |
| 83 | 2024/04/24 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion 82 regarding a preliminary injunction is granted. The parties have agreed that the modified TRO [ 77, 78 ] should remain in effect as a preliminary injunction until the final disposition of this case or until it is terminated by mutual agreement or otherwise. A separate Order will issue. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 47 is stricken as moot. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：关于初步禁令的被告动议82获得批准。各方同意修改后的临时限制令[77, 78]应作为初步禁令继续有效，直至本案最终处理或双方协议终止或其他情况终止。将发出单独的命令。原告关于初步禁令的动议47因无实际意义而被撤销。已发送通知。 |
| 82 | 2024/04/23 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for Entry of Proposed Order Regarding Preliminary Injunction
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的关于初步禁令的拟议命令的动议 |
| 81 | 2024/04/18 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' unopposed motion for an extension of time 80 is granted. Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31's response to the motion for a preliminary injunction is now due by April 24, 2024. Mailed notice.
庭审记录由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持：特定被告提出的无异议延期申请第80号获得批准。被告编号2、4、5、6、7、9、10、12、14、15、16、17、18、19、22、23、24、25、26、27、28、29、30和31对初步禁令动议的回应期限延长至2024年4月24日。已发送通知。 |
| 80 | 2024/04/18 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for preliminary injunction 47 (UNOPPOSED)
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出动议，请求延长提交关于初步禁令动议47的回应/答复的时间（无反对） |
| 78 | 2024/04/17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins:The TRO is modified consistent with the separate sealed order issued today. Mailed notice. |
| 77 | 2024/04/16 |
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 4/16/2024. Mailed notice.
由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官于2024年4月16日书写的命令。已邮寄通知。 |
| 76 | 2024/04/16 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendants' motion to modify the TRO [42] is granted. The asset freeze will be reduced to the total amount of revenue generated from the allegedly infringing products as reflected in the Temu data, for a total of $176,408.50 across the relevant Defendants. By tomorrow, April 17, 2024, the parties shall submit to the Court's proposed order inbox a modified TRO consistent with this Order. Mailed notice.
记录由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官作出：被告修改临时限制令[42]的动议获准。资产冻结将减少至据称侵权产品在Temu数据中反映的总收入金额，总计为176,408.50美元，涉及相关被告。各方须于2024年4月17日前向法院提交修改后的临时限制令，以符合本命令。已发送通知。 |
| 75 | 2024/04/16 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 unopposed motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead [74] is granted. These Defendants' responsive pleading is now due by April 30, 2024. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：被告编号2、4、5、6、7、9、10、12、14、15、16、17、18、19、22、23、24、25、26、27、28、29、30和31提出的无异议延期答辩或以其他方式回应的动议[74]已获批准。这些被告的回应答辩现在应于2024年4月30日前提交。已发送通知。 |
| 74 | 2024/04/12 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to Complaint
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的延期答复或以其他方式回应起诉状的时间的动议 |
| 73 | 2024/04/11 |
ORDER signed by Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins. Mailed notice.
命令由Lindsay C. Jenkins法官签署。邮寄通知。 |
| 72 | 2024/04/11 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following applies only to Defendants 1, 3, 8, 11, 13, 20, and 21. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction as to these Defendants only is granted. The motion remains pending as to the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [65] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of the relevant defendants. Enter preliminary injunction order. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：以下内容仅适用于被告1、3、8、11、13、20和21。原告针对这些被告的初步禁令动议获得批准。针对其余被告的动议仍待处理。原告的文件显示，其已迅速采取行动保护其利益，且存在被告将相关资产转移至法院管辖范围之外的重大风险。基于这些理由，以及原告提交文件中的全部内容和法院在临时限制令（TRO）下达时所述理由，法院确信原告已满足初步禁令的要求。此外，法院认为损害平衡有利于原告，初步禁令通过保护消费者免受假冒商品营销等措施，符合公共利益。原告已证明并确认[65]已向被告提供本案电子通知，并提供了一个包含相关案件文件的网站链接，但相关被告未就初步禁令动议提出反对。下达初步禁令命令。已发送通知。 |
| 71 | 2024/04/10 |
STATUS Report (Joint) by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
状态报告（联合）由Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交 |
| 70 | 2024/04/10 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The following does not apply to Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31. The Court intends to grant a preliminary injunction as to the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff has established that it provided electronic notice to the remaining defendants, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf of the remaining Defendant by the April 5, 2024 deadline. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to send a proposed order naming the relevant Defendants to the Court's proposed order box by April 11, 2024. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：以下内容不适用于第2、4、5、6、7、9、10、12、14、15、16、17、18、19、22、23、24、25、26、27、28、29、30和31号被告。法院打算对剩余的被告给予初步禁令。原告已证明其向剩余被告提供了电子通知，但截至2024年4月5日的截止日期前，剩余被告未就初步禁令动议提出反对意见。原告的律师被指示于2024年4月11日前将涉及相关被告的拟议命令发送至法院的拟议命令箱。已发送通知。 |
| 69 | 2024/04/04 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court are several Defendants' motion to modify the temporary restraining order ("TRO") 42. The motions to seal filings in connection with that motion 57, 67 are granted. The Defendants state that their investigation into the profits derived from sales of the allegedly infringing products continues, but in the interim, they propose that the TRO be reduced to the amount of the total sales of the allegedly infringing products. 45 at 3. Plaintiff does not appear to dispute that an asset freeze can only properly reach the amount of profits attributable to the infringing products, but it argues that because that figure is unknown, it is proper to maintain the asset freeze as to all funds in Defendants' accounts. 58 at 2-3. The Court agrees that it is important to protect Plaintiff's rights while determining the profits that may be subject to a disgorgement remedy, but ultimately the Court agrees with Defendants that reducing the asset freeze to the amount of sales of allegedly infringing products is sufficient to protect Plaintiff's ability to recover the funds it is entitled to via an equitable remedy without subjecting Defendants to an overbroad injunction. This is the approach that the courts in two other Roadget Schedule A cases have taken, see 45 at 3-4, and the Court will follow it here, too. The Court will not modify the TRO now, however, because Plaintiff also objects to the reliability of Defendants' evidence of the amount of sales. 58 at 4-5. In their reply 68, Defendants provide additional evidence from the Temu representative. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer and to file a joint status report by April 10, 2024, stating: (1) whether they have reached an agreement about the proper amount of assets to freeze; (2) if not, how the parties propose to adjudicate any dispute about the proper scope of the asset freeze, including a proposal for an evidentiary hearing, should one be necessary. If the parties believe a hearing is necessary, they should be aware that the Court generally does not permit testifying witnesses to appear remotely, although it may consider making exceptions in this case given the case's preliminary posture and the possible logistical difficulties in securing in-person testimony in a timely fashion. As an alternative or complement to a modification of the TRO, the Court would also entertain dissolving or modifying the TRO if a Defendant posts bond for the amount of the frozen assets; if the Court reduces the amount of the asset freeze, any bond would likewise be reduced. Such a reduction could be done as soon as practicable, permitting Defendants to resume operation of their stores with respect to non-challenged products. If any Defendant wishes to pursue this option, it should consult with Plaintiff to see if Plaintiff opposes to a modification of the TRO for this purpose. For now, the motion to modify the TRO 42 is entered and continued. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：法庭上，几位被告提出修改临时限制令("TRO")的动议42。关于该动议的文件密封动议57、67已获批准。被告声明，他们对涉嫌侵权产品销售利润的调查仍在继续，但在此期间，他们提议将TRO减少到涉嫌侵权产品的总销售额。原告似乎并不反对资产冻结只能适当涉及侵权产品产生的利润，但由于该数字未知，原告认为维持对被告账户中所有资金的资产冻结是适当的。法庭认为，在确定可能受追缴救济影响的利润时，保护原告的权利至关重要，但最终法庭同意被告的观点，即将资产冻结减少到涉嫌侵权产品的销售额足以保护原告通过衡平法救济获得其应得资金的权益，而不会使被告受到过宽的禁令。这是其他两个Roadget Schedule A案件中法院采取的方法，法庭也将在此遵循这一做法。然而，由于原告还对被告提供的销售额证据的可靠性提出异议，法庭目前不会修改TRO。在他们的回复中，被告提供了来自Temu代表的额外证据。法庭指示各方会面协商，并于2024年4月10日前提交联合状态报告，说明：(1)他们是否就冻结资产的适当金额达成协议；(2)如果没有，各方提议如何裁决关于资产冻结适当范围的任何争议，包括提出证据听证会的建议，如果必要的话。如果各方认为需要听证，他们应该知道，法庭通常不允许远程作证证人，尽管考虑到案件的初步性质和及时安排现场证言可能面临的物流困难，法庭可能会考虑在此案中作出例外。作为修改TRO的替代或补充，如果被告为冻结资产的金额提供保证金，法庭也愿意考虑解除或修改TRO；如果法庭减少资产冻结的金额，任何保证金也将相应减少。这种减少可以尽快实施，允许被告恢复其商店中未受质疑产品的运营。如果任何被告希望追求这一选项，应与原告协商，了解原告是否反对为此目的修改TRO。目前，修改TRO的动议42已提出并继续审理。邮寄通知。 |
| 68 | 2024/04/03 |
SEALED REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sealed response, 58 In Support Of Defendants' Emergency Opposed Motion To Modify TRO
封存的答复，由本文件附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织提交，针对封存的回应，第58号文件，支持被告紧急反对修改临时限制令的动议 |
| 67 | 2024/04/03 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document reply to response to motion, 66 (UNOPPOSED)
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的封存文件回复动议，第66号（无反对） |
| 66 | 2024/04/03 |
REPLY by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to sealed response, 58 In Support Of Defendants' Emergency Opposed Motion To Modify TRO (REDACTED)
被识别在附表A中的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司协会对封存回应的答复，第58号，支持被告紧急反对修改临时限制令的动议（已编辑） |
| 65 | 2024/04/03 |
DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson of Service
Taylor J. Wilson的服务声明 |
| 64 | 2024/04/03 |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 4/3/2024, answer due 4/24/2024.
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 对附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织于2024年4月3日执行传票，答辩期限为2024年4月24日。 |
| 63 | 2024/04/01 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' have filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to respond the preliminary injunction motion 61, which is granted. Those Defendants who have sought an extension of time (that is, Defendant Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12,14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31) may file their response by April 19, 2024; any reply is due by April 26, 2024. All other Defendants who have not so moved for an extension must still file any opposition by April 5, 2024, as previously ordered 60. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：特定被告已提交一份关于延长初步禁令动议61回应时间的无异议动议，该动议已获批准。寻求延长时间的被告（即被告编号2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30和31）可于2024年4月19日前提交其回应；任何反驳文件应于2024年4月26日前提交。未申请延长的其他被告仍须按照先前命令60的规定，于2024年4月5日前提交任何反对意见。已发送通知。 |
| 62 | 2024/03/29 |
DECLARATION of Taylor J. Wilson
Taylor J. Wilson的声明 |
| 61 | 2024/03/29 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for preliminary injunction 47 (UNOPPOSED)
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出动议，请求延期提交关于初步禁令动议47的回应/答复（无异议） |
| 60 | 2024/03/29 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion 47 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by April 5, 2024." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO 52 until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. Mailed notice.
记录由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官作出：法庭前有原告的第47号动议，要求发布初步禁令。关于该动议，原告必须向所有剩余被告送达以下声明：“法庭已将初步禁令的动议置于考虑之下，并将视该动议为未受反对，除非有被告在2024年4月5日前出现并提出反对。”如在该日期前未收到反对，法庭将视该动议为未受反对。原告必须在记录上登记此分钟令后一个工作日内，向所有剩余被告送达此分钟令，并必须立即提交送达证明。根据法庭发布临时限制令的命令中所述理由，法庭批准原告延长临时限制令第52号的动议，直至法庭裁决初步禁令的动议。参见H-D Mich., LLC诉Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A.案，694 F.3d 827, 843-45（第七巡回法院2012年）。由于此延期超过了联邦民事诉讼规则65(b)规定的临时限制令最长期限，此延期“实际上成为可上诉的初步禁令，但该命令仍然有效。”同上，第844页。已发送通知。 |
| 59 | 2024/03/29 |
NOTICE by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto of Intent to File Reply in Support of Emergency Motion to Modify Temporary Restraining Order
关于《附表A》中所列个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织的回复意向通知，以支持紧急修改临时限制令的动议 |
| 58 | 2024/03/28 |
SEALED RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO 42
封存的回应，由Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.针对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的紧急反对修改临时限制令的动议42号作出。 |
| 57 | 2024/03/28 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Response To Motion To Modify Temporary Restraining Order (Unopposed)
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出动议，封存对修改临时限制令动议的回应（无异议） |
| 56 | 2024/03/28 |
RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO 42
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的紧急反对修改临时限制令的动议作出回应 |
| 55 | 2024/03/27 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's unopposed motion to seal [49] is granted. The material filed in support of the request for a preliminary injunction may remain under seal. Defendants' motion to seal certain material submitted with the motion to modify the TRO [44] is also granted. The material filed in support of that motion may remain under seal. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：原告未受反对的封存动议[49]获得批准。支持请求初步禁令的材料可以继续封存。被告关于封存与修改临时限制令动议[44]一同提交的某些材料的动议也获得批准。支持该动议的材料可以继续封存。已邮寄通知。 |
| 54 | 2024/03/27 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Certain Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead [53] is granted. The moving Defendants' responsive pleading is now due by April 16, 2024. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：特定被告提出的无异议延期答辩或以其他方式回应的动议[53]已获批准。该动议被告的回应文件应于2024年4月16日前提交。已发送通知。 |
| 53 | 2024/03/26 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto for extension of time to file answer or otherwise respond to Complaint
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的延期答复或以其他方式回应起诉状的动议 |
| 52 | 2024/03/22 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Extend The TRO Through The Disposition Of The Preliminary Injunction Motion
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出动议，要求将临时限制令延长至初步禁令动议处理完毕 |
| 51 | 2024/03/22 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. - Sealed Declaration Of Taylor J. Wilson In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.封存的文件 - Taylor J. Wilson支持原告初步禁令动议的封存声明 |
| 50 | 2024/03/22 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. - Sealed Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Entry Of A Preliminary Injunction
封存的文件。原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交的封存法律备忘录，以支持原告申请初步禁令的动议。 |
| 49 | 2024/03/22 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Supporting Papers To Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Unopposed)
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出动议，封存支持初步禁令动议的文件（无异议） |
| 48 | 2024/03/22 |
MEMORANDUM by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 47
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交的备忘录，支持编号47的初步禁令动议 |
| 47 | 2024/03/22 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for preliminary injunction
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出初步禁令的动议 |
| 46 | 2024/03/22 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Several Defendants move to modify the terms of the temporary restraining order ("TRO") the Court issued 42. The Court agrees with Defendants that Plaintiff's requested 28 days to respond is too long under these circumstances. Plaintiff's response is due by March 28, 2024 and should also state Plaintiff's position on Defendants' motion to seal 44. If Defendants wish to file a reply, they must so indicate by 12:00 p.m. Central Daylight Time on March 29, 2024; any reply shall be filed by April 3, 2024. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：几位被告请求修改法院发布的临时限制令（"TRO"）的条款。法院同意被告的意见，认为原告请求的28天回应期限在此情况下过长。原告的回应应于2024年3月28日前提交，并应表明原告对被告密封动议的立场。如果被告希望提交回复，必须在2024年3月29日中部夏令时间中午12:00前表明；任何回复应在2024年4月3日前提交。已发送通知。 |
| 45 | 2024/03/21 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' OPPOSED EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY TRO
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提交的封存文件。支持被告反对紧急动议修改临时限制令的备忘录 |
| 44 | 2024/03/21 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto to seal document memorandum in support of motion, 43 the Casaceli Declaration with Exhibit A and the Yang Decl., Gu Decl., Liu Decl., Xu Decl., Ji Decl., He Decl., and Luo Decl.
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出动议，要求密封支持动议的文件备忘录、第43号Casaceli声明及其附件A，以及Yang声明、Gu声明、Liu声明、Xu声明、Ji声明、He声明和Luo声明。 |
| 43 | 2024/03/21 |
MEMORANDUM by The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 42 EMERGENCY OPPOSED MOTION (redacted version)
关于The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提交的支持编号42紧急反对动议（修订版）的备忘录 |
| 42 | 2024/03/21 |
MOTION by Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto Emergency Opposed Motion to Modify TRO
被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto提出的紧急反对修改临时限制令的动议 |
| 41 | 2024/03/19 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion to extend the TRO 40 is granted. The TRO is extended through and including April 2, 2024. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：原告关于延长TRO 40的动议获得批准。TRO延长至2024年4月2日，包括当日。已发送通知。 |
| 40 | 2024/03/18 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. To Extend Temporary Restraining Order (Ex Parte)
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出动议，请求延长临时限制令（单方面） |
| 39 | 2024/03/18 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by Christopher James Fahy Defendants 2, 4-7, 9, 10, 12, 14-19, and 22-31 in Sched. A to the Complaint
Christopher James Fahy代表被告，即申诉书中附表A所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织中的被告2、4-7、9、10、12、14-19和22-31出庭 |
| 38 | 2024/03/18 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto by William W. Flachsbart for Defendant No. 2, 4-7, 9, 10, 12, 14-19, 22-31
William W. Flachsbart代表被告名单A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织出庭，涉及被告编号2、4-7、9、10、12、14-19、22-31 |
| 37 | 2024/03/12 |
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 3/12/2024, answer due 4/2/2024.
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 对附表A中所列的个人、公司、有限责任公司、合伙企业及非公司组织于2024年3月12日执行传票，答辩截止日期为2024年4月2日。 |
| 2024/03/12 |
SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
针对被告The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto的传票已发出 |
|
| 36 | 2024/03/11 |
SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. (Document not scanned.)
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. 提交了金额为$10,000的保证金债券（文件未扫描）。 |
| 34 | 2024/03/05 |
Sealed Order written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/5/2024. Mailed notice.
封存的命令。由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官于2024年3月5日撰写。邮寄通知。 |
| 33 | 2024/03/04 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Declaration of Deepa A. Chari |
| 32 | 2024/03/04 | STATEMENT by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Regarding Temporary Restraining Order |
| 30 | 2024/03/01 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Plaintiff's sealed motion for a temporary restraining order [16] is granted in part and continued in part. By March 4, 2024, Plaintiff is to submit a revised proposed TRO order to the Court's proposed order inbox that (1) limits the Defendants to which it applies to those specified in the attached Order; (2) includes a schedule of those Defendants in the body of the Order; and (3) contains any other edits necessary to be consistent with the Order. Also by March 4, 2024, Plaintiff shall file on the docket a statement regarding next steps as to the Defendants to which the TRO will not apply, including (1) whether and when Plaintiff will submit evidence of those Defendants' infringement, as discussed in the attached Order; and (2) Plaintiff's view on whether the TRO the Court has granted should not be issued immediately because a TRO entered by the Court, and the related portions of the Complaint, would need to be unsealed once an asset freeze has gone into effect to ensure the affected Defendants can respond. Further, at any time, Plaintiff may submit: (1) evidence of other Defendants' infringement without needing to formally move for a TRO or rehash points made in Plaintiff's earlier papers; and (2) an additional proposed TRO order that also applies to those Defendants. If such a proposed TRO order referenced in point (2) is submitted concurrently with the proposed TRO order the Court requested above, it should be drafted to apply also to the Defendants to which the attached Order applies. Plaintiff may file statements referred to in this minute entry under seal. Mailed notice.
庭审记录由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持：根据附件中的命令所述理由，原告封存的临时限制令动议[16]部分获准，部分继续审理。至2024年3月4日前，原告需向法院的提议命令收件箱提交修订后的临时限制令草案，该草案需满足以下条件：(1) 限制令仅适用于附件命令中指定的被告；(2) 在命令正文中包含这些被告的时间表；(3) 包含为与命令保持一致所需的其他任何修改。同样至2024年3月4日前，原告应在案卷上提交关于临时限制令不适用的被告的下一步行动声明，包括：(1) 是否及何时原告将提交这些被告侵权的证据，如附件命令中所讨论；(2) 原告的观点，即法院已批准的临时限制令是否不应立即发布，因为一旦资产冻结生效，法院发布的临时限制令及其相关投诉部分需要解封，以确保受影响的被告能够回应。此外，原告可随时提交：(1) 无需正式申请临时限制令或重复原告早期文件中的观点，即可提交其他被告侵权的证据；(2) 适用于这些被告的额外临时限制令草案。如果上述第(2)点提到的临时限制令草案与法院上述要求的临时限制令草案同时提交，则应起草为也适用于附件命令中指定的被告。原告可按本庭审记录所述，密封提交声明。已邮寄通知。 |
| 29 | 2024/02/28 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion to seal 27 is granted. The filing at 28 may remain sealed. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持下，原告关于密封第27项文件的动议获得批准。第28项文件的密封状态得以维持。已发送通知。 |
| 28 | 2024/02/27 | SEALED REPLY by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to Response 24 by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC To Motion For Temporary Restraining Order |
| 27 | 2024/02/27 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal Reply To Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC's Amicus Curiae Brief
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出动议，要求封存对Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig PLLC的法庭之友简报的回复 |
| 26 | 2024/02/27 | REPLY by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to Response 24 |
| 25 | 2024/02/27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Taylor James Wilson |
| 24 | 2024/02/20 |
RESPONSE by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC to motion for temporary restraining order, 14 as Amicus Curiae
Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC对临时限制令动议的回应，作为法庭之友，第14号 |
| 23 | 2024/02/15 |
NOTICE by Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC of Intent to File Amicus Brief
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC通知有意提交法庭之友简报 |
| 22 | 2024/02/13 |
ORDER written by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 2/13/2024. Mailed notice.
由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官于2024年2月13日书写的命令。已邮寄通知。 |
| 21 | 2024/02/13 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Over Plaintiff's opposition, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC's motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief 17 is granted. Its motion for leave to file a reply brief 20 is denied as moot. See attached order for details. If the Firm wishes to file a response brief to Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, it must so indicate by February 15, 2024; the brief is due by February 20, 2024. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, is due by February 27, 2024. Separately, as explained in the attached order, by February 20, 2024, the Firm shall file a statement describing whether it has been paid for its work on its amicus filings and whether it will attempt to collect for that work from any future client. Mailed notice.
在尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官面前进行的记录：尽管原告反对，Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC提出的允许提交法庭之友简报的动议17获得批准。其提出的允许提交答复简报的动议20被视为无效而拒绝。详情请参阅附件命令。如果该律所希望对原告提出的临时限制令动议提交回应简报，必须在2024年2月15日前表明；简报应在2024年2月20日前提交。原告的答复简报，如有，应在2024年2月27日前提交。另外，根据附件命令中的说明，该律所应在2024年2月20日前提交一份声明，描述其是否已为其在法庭之友文件上的工作获得报酬，以及是否将从任何未来客户那里尝试收取该工作的费用。已发送通知。 |
| 20 | 2024/02/12 |
MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file a Reply in Support of Amicus Curiae Brief
Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC 提出动议，请求允许提交支持法庭之友意见书的回复 |
| 19 | 2024/02/09 | RESPONSE by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.in Opposition to MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief 17 |
| 18 | 2024/02/05 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Any response to the motion for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief 17 is due by February 9, 2024. No reply is to be filed unless the Court requests one. The motion to seal 15 is granted. The motion for a TRO [ 14 (redacted), 16 (sealed)] is entered and continued until after the Court resolves the amicus motion. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的记录：对第17号提交法庭之友摘要许可动议的任何回应应于2024年2月9日前提交。除非法庭要求，否则无需提交回复。第15号密封动议获得批准。第14号（已编辑）和第16号（已密封）的临时限制令动议已提交并持续至法庭解决法庭之友动议之后。已发送通知。 |
| 17 | 2024/02/02 |
MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief
Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC 提出动议，请求允许提交法庭之友简报 |
| 16 | 2024/02/01 |
SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd., MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order
封存的动议由原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出，Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.作为原告提出临时限制令的动议 |
| 15 | 2024/02/01 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal document MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出封存文件的动议，Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.原告提出临时限制令的动议 |
| 14 | 2024/02/01 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. for temporary restraining order
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出临时限制令的动议 |
| 13 | 2024/01/26 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief 11 is granted. Mailed notice.
尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持的庭审记录：批准第11号动议，即允许提交法庭之友意见书。已发送通知。 |
| 12 | 2024/01/26 |
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file the complaint under seal 7 is granted in part and denied in part. In light of the other cases Plaintiff has filed in this district touching on the matters raised by this case, the Court struggles to see why an indefinite period for sealing is warranted. Consistent with the ruling in Roadget Business v. Schedule A, Case No. 24-cv-115 [Dkt. 19], the motion is granted for ten (10) days only.Mailed notice.
庭审记录由尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官主持：原告关于密封提交诉状的动议7部分获准，部分被驳回。鉴于原告在本地区提起的其他涉及本案争议事项的案件，法院难以理解为何需要无限期密封。根据Roadget Business诉Schedule A案（案件编号24-cv-115 [Dkt. 19]）中的裁决，该动议仅获准密封十（10）天。已发送通知。 |
| 11 | 2024/01/25 |
MOTION by Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC for leave to file an Amicus Curiae Brief
Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC 提出动议，请求允许提交法庭之友简报 |
| 10 | 2024/01/25 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Amicus Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC by William W. Flachsbart |
| 9 | 2024/01/24 |
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC
已向华盛顿特区的注册官邮寄版权报告 |
| 2024/01/24 |
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
书记员通知：根据本地规则73.1(b)，本法院的一名美国治安法官可主持本民事案件的所有诉讼程序。如果所有当事人同意由当前指定的美国治安法官主持本案的所有程序，包括审判、最终判决的录入及所有审后程序，所有当事人必须在附带的同意表上签名。此同意表仅在所有当事人签字后才可提交。当事人亦可通过联合提交文件，包括联合初始状态报告或拟议的案件管理令，表达其同意由治安法官管辖。 |
|
| 2024/01/24 |
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
案件分配给尊敬的Lindsay C. Jenkins法官。尊敬的Jeffrey T. Gilbert法官被指定为治安法官。案件分配方式：随机分配（民事类别3）。 |
|
| 8 | 2024/01/23 |
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. Sealed Complaint
封存的文件。原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交的封存诉状 |
| 7 | 2024/01/23 |
MOTION by Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. to seal (Motion for leave to file complaint under seal)
原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提出动议，要求封存（申请允许封存起诉状的动议） |
| 6 | 2024/01/23 |
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.根据地方规则3.2通知关联公司 |
| 5 | 2024/01/23 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Deepa Arundati Chari
Deepa Arundati Chari代表原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.出庭 |
| 4 | 2024/01/23 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Matthew D. Binder
Matthew D. Binder代表原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.出庭 |
| 3 | 2024/01/23 |
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Roadget Business Pte. Ltd. by Steven Joseph Horowitz
Steven Joseph Horowitz代表原告Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.出庭 |
| 2 | 2024/01/23 |
CIVIL Cover Sheet
民事案卷封面 |
| 1 | 2024/01/23 |
COMPLAINT (Redacted Version) filed by Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21559510.
Roadget Business Pte. Ltd.提交的起诉书（修订版）；要求陪审团审判。提交费用为405美元，收据编号AILNDC-21559510。 |