DEFAULT Final Judgment Order. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 10/15/2025. Mailed notice.
23
2025/10/08
Order on Motion for Default Judgment
22
2025/10/01
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: A telephone hearing as to the motion for entry of default and default judgment against Saifanxin [21] is set for 10/8/2025 at 9:30 a.m. To join the telephone conference, dial (650) 479-3207, Access Code 180 815 7648. Throughout the hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Counsel must be in a quiet area while on the line. Please be sure to keep your phone on mute when you are not speaking. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the Court. Mailed notice.
21
2025/09/30
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to SAIFANXIN
20
2025/09/03
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to ABC Corporation on 8/29/2025, answer due 9/19/2025.
19
2025/08/29
SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant ABC Corporation (qrtr,)
18
2025/08/27
SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) ABC Corporation, a Chinese Entity by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited
17
2025/08/05
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The ex parte motion for entry of a temporary restraining order ("TRO") and expedited discovery [15] is denied in part and granted in part. The motion is denied in that the Court will not enter a TRO or an asset restraint for the same reasons the Court recently denied the motion for a TRO and asset restraint in Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Case No. 25-cv-05945, ECF No. 21. The motion is granted in that Plaintiff has leave to take expedited discovery. The motion for electronic service [14] is granted. Mailed notice.
16
2025/08/05
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the last two months. Second, as relevant to personal jurisdiction, without which any temporary restraining order or asset freeze would be invalid, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant sold at least one allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Here, "sold" means that the defendant accepted an order and payment for an allegedly infringing product to be shipped to Illinois. Third, to assure that Court that the rights of defendants who have not yet been served are being appropriately protected, the declaration must identify the case number(s) and assigned judge(s) for any pending case(s) brought by the plaintiff(s) against any of the named defendants, noting whether the intellectual property at issue was the same or different than in this case. If it is the same, the declaration should describe the disposition of the other case. The Court will address any motion for a temporary restraining order only after receipt of the described declaration, which can be filed contemporaneously with the motion. Mailed notice.
15
2025/08/05
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order EX PARTE MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
14
2025/08/05
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FRCP 4(f)(3)
13
2025/08/04
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: Motion for leave to file under seal [4] is granted. Mailed notice.
12
2025/07/31
MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC.
2025/07/31
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order.
2025/07/31
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Daniel P. McLaughlin. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3).
11
2025/07/30
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu
10
2025/07/30
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu
9
2025/07/30
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn
8
2025/07/30
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter
7
2025/07/30
ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin
6
2025/07/30
NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited
5
2025/07/30
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT
4
2025/07/30
MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL
3
2025/07/30
CIVIL Cover Sheet
2
2025/07/30
SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited UNREDACTED COMPLAINT AND EXHIBITS
1
2025/07/30
COMPLAINT filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23819194.